Ever water soaked your drums?
- Bernd
----- Original Message -----
From: "Josh Battles" <jbattles@bankfinancial.com>
To: <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net>
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 2:22 PM
Subject: Re: DML:Rear brake conversion
>
> how are discs safer? Drums are tried and true, I've never had an issue
with
> drums other than the hassle of changing shoes and adjustment. Other than
> that they've been great for me over the years. I've never owned a car
that
> came with rear discs. I converted the stang I had before I bought the
truck
> and didn't really notice any diffrerence other than that the rear wheels
got
> brake dust on them. it stopped just about the same.
>
> --
> - Josh
> Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L
> www.geocities.com/lenny187/dakota.html
> www.omg-stfu.com
>
>
> ""Bernd D. Ratsch"" <fasstdak@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:BAY9-DAV26YoDK7n0sw00004dac@hotmail.com...
> >
> > I look at it from another standpoint - I'd rather have 4-Wheel discs on
my
> > truck (for added safety) than the drums. Less problems and less
> headaches.
> >
> > - Bernd
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Josh Battles" <jbattles@bankfinancial.com>
> > To: <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net>
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 11:02 AM
> > Subject: Re: DML:Rear brake conversion
> >
> >
> > >
> > > I don't think I'd go that far. I think what David was trying to
express
> > was
> > > that the swap would only be cost effective if you really need it.
> > > Personally, It doesn't really matter enough to me that I'd want to
swap
> to
> > > discs. The main reason that I'd do it would be for the "cool factor"
of
> > it.
> > >
> > > --
> > > - Josh
> > > Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L
> > > www.geocities.com/lenny187/dakota.html
> > > www.omg-stfu.com
> > >
> > >
> > > ""Bernd D. Ratsch"" <fasstdak@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:BAY9-DAV40vsTDWWcuZ0000089f@hotmail.com...
> > > >
> > > > Uhoh...better tell Chrysler to put the rear drums back on the 03+
> > models.
> > > > ;)
> > > >
> > > > - Bernd
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: <david.clement@verizon.net>
> > > > To: <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 9:46 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: DML:Rear brake conversion
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > IMHO, unless you are consistently carrying a load the cost of
doing
> > the
> > > > swap is
> > > > > going to be a waste of money. In an empty or lightly loaded truck
> > there
> > > is
> > > > so
> > > > > little traction out back that the rear wheels provide little in
the
> > way
> > > of
> > > > > stopping power. That's why they all have anti-lock brakes on the
> back
> > > > wheels.
> > > > >
> > > > > Your money would better spent upgrading the fronts.
> > > > >
> > > > > Dave Clement
> > > > > 99 SLT+ CC 4x4
> > > > >
> > > > > In article <20040427213358.59283.qmail@web21104.mail.yahoo.com>,
> > > > > pbatson68@yahoo.com (Phillip Batson) writes:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Has anyone done the conversion from the drum to the
> > > > > > disc in the rear? I'd like to get your thoughts on it
> > > > > > before I head out to the shops.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > THanks!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > =====
> > > > > > Phil
> > > > > > 2000 4x4 CC 4.7L
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat May 01 2004 - 12:00:18 EDT