Re: DML:Rear brake conversion

From: Tony Cellana (acellan1@tampabay.rr.com)
Date: Sat May 01 2004 - 11:14:02 EDT


I prefer the Flintstone variety ;-)

-----Original Message-----
From: greg conner <dodgeboy93@hotmail.com>
To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
Date: Saturday, May 01, 2004 2:43 AM
Subject: Re: DML:Rear brake conversion

>
>are disc brakes or drum brakes better????
>
>
>=-P
>
>
>Greg Conner
>1996 RC
>3.9 hybrid
>
>
>
>
>
>>From: "Ronald Taylor" <scsilverdakdml@hotmail.com>
>>Reply-To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
>>To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
>>Subject: Re: DML:Rear brake conversion
>>Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 17:21:28 -0400
>>
>>
>>I meant that the difference in braking between drum and disc systems is
>>that the disc package is much better at stopping over a drum
>>system.........
>>
>>I personally prefer a disc sytem to drum brakes..........
>>
>>the offering of disc brakes on the rear of a late model vehicle isn't so
>>much of a marketing ploy as it is a technological advancement of a vehicle
>>product line.
>>
>>Maybe I should go into lurk mode as any time I contribute my opinion, or
>>make a comment I wind up getting flamed for it.
>>
>>Better yet just delete this e-mail message.........I''ll keep my mouth
shut
>>unless I'm asked a question directly.
>>
>>Ron
>>01' Dakota Sport 3.9 4WD
>>http://www.scsilverdak.1colony.com
>>
>>_________________________________________________________________
>>Stop worrying about overloading your inbox - get MSN Hotmail Extra
Storage!
>>http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-us&page=hotmail/es2&ST=1/go/onm00200362av
e/direct/01/
>>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Express yourself with the new version of MSN Messenger! Download today -
>it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jun 01 2004 - 10:59:11 EDT