Re: Which manifold for a SCer?

From: TJ Goettner (dakota52318@toad.net)
Date: Sat Jul 24 2004 - 13:09:42 EDT


In what way do you think it is better? Is it that there is only one
direction for the air to go, or is the volume of the M1 less than the beer
barrel allowing a little faster build up of pressure etc...? Whats the word
on that turtle deal, havent heard any talk of it hear recently?

TJ
1992 Dakota
318, 4X4, Long Bed
46RH, MP Comp
Vortech SCer at 6#
Crane Ignition, Custom TB
DT Headers, 4350 lbs.
14.3@96.5 Best to Date.

----- Original Message -----
From: <B1LLYW@aol.com>
To: <aol@dakota-truck.net>
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 7:58 PM
Subject: Re: DML: Which manifold for a SCer?

>
>
>
>
>
> In a message dated 7/23/2004 7:45:14 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> dakota52318@toad.net writes:
>
>
> > Right now Im pleased with the times Im putting down with the stock beer
> > barrel, but I was wondering if any of you SCed guys have put on the M1
> > after running the stocker and noticed any improvement or had it dynoed
to
> > see the difference made by it. Would the sngle plane really help that
much
> > like it does on a NA motor or would the fact that the air is getting
forced
> > into the motor anyway make up for the fact the runners are so long to
boost
> > low end response on a stocker?
> >
>
> It will absolutely help. Many of our blower guys are actually running the
> 4-barrel M1.
>
> Bill White - KRC Performance
>
> http://www.bionicdodge.com
>
> '95 Dakota CC 4x2 - 408, 5 speed, 8 3/4, etc.
> '04 Liberty, 4x4, 3.7, 5 speed, LSD
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 00:46:15 EDT