Re: Re: Difference between 91 and 92-up

From: Josh Battles (josh@omg-stfu.com)
Date: Mon Aug 30 2004 - 15:56:56 EDT


"Terrible Tom" <SilverEightynine@aol.com> wrote in message
news:41337752.4010006@aol.com...

> The bell housings on my 2wd and my 4x4 tranny are totally different.
> Here's the kicker. The engine in christine was originally in the 2wd.
> When I went to bolt the 2wd tranny up to the engine it was originally
> used with, the problem was with the bell housing on the drivers side.
> I'll have to get pics to show you. I forgot how the starter mounts on
> teh 2wd - but on the 4x4 - it bolts TO the bellhousing - not the engine.

Yes, but he's already got a combination that's already together and running.
Why not just move it as a unit after the body's off of the old truck and
before the body goes onto the new truck? Then it would be relatively easy
to pinpoint any problems right away.

> >
> > It just doesn't make sense that dodge would cast two seperate engine
blocks
> > and trans bellhousings - one for 2wd and another for 4wd.
>
>
> Engines are the same - bellhousings arnt

How can two different bellhousings bolt up to the same motor? If they're
really *that* different I suspect you'd have all sorts of other issues to go
with that.

> Differences in the front suspensions are too great I think - the effort
> required to do such a thing would not be worth it if you ask me. I'll
> try and get pics of my two trannys in the next day or so. Off to work I
go

Would that effort be more or less than swapping frames? And please post
pics, I really don't understand how they could be that different and still
bolt to the motor correctly.

-- 
- Josh
Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L
All facts have been omitted from this post.
www.omg-stfu.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Sep 01 2004 - 00:53:42 EDT