-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 10/5/2004 10:16 PM, Aaron Wyse wrote:
| It's not a matter of a diesel Dak being considered a heavy hauler, a
diesel
| in it would make it handle pulling the same loads much easier, and with
| better mileage. I wouldn't complain if I could get 30-35mpg and pull
| 6-7000#. But few Daks now can get over 20mpg, including the
4cylinders; and
| what does a loaded V8 Dakota get for mileage.. maybe 12mpg?
| As long as DC wouldn't try to stick it in & break it off like they do
on the
| Cummins Rams; a diesel Dak would be practical.
| Aaron Wyse
Do you mean "loaded" as in options, or hauling a trailer?
- --
- -andy
http://home.rochester.rr.com/alevy/dakota - andy-dml@levyclan.us
- --------------------------------------------
"Whatever Adam does, do the opposite and you'll be fine"
-Bob Tom
- --------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFBZKlKxPJNBidNgHkRAso0AJ9fddqgs9+TmnrTwFYIgUGnvfqTSQCfc/Vo
KRje260brQkkmNMrcn2d66U=
=SXdR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Nov 01 2004 - 10:47:42 EST