as in hauling a trailer.. options add up.. but not as fast as a loaded
trailer does.
Aaron
----- Original Message -----
From: "andy levy" <andy-dml@levyclan.us>
To: <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net>
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 9:26 PM
Subject: Re: DML: I Took A Gen IV For A Spin Today
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/5/2004 10:16 PM, Aaron Wyse wrote:
>
> | It's not a matter of a diesel Dak being considered a heavy hauler, a
> diesel
> | in it would make it handle pulling the same loads much easier, and with
> | better mileage. I wouldn't complain if I could get 30-35mpg and pull
> | 6-7000#. But few Daks now can get over 20mpg, including the
> 4cylinders; and
> | what does a loaded V8 Dakota get for mileage.. maybe 12mpg?
> | As long as DC wouldn't try to stick it in & break it off like they do
> on the
> | Cummins Rams; a diesel Dak would be practical.
> | Aaron Wyse
>
> Do you mean "loaded" as in options, or hauling a trailer?
>
> - --
> - -andy
>
> http://home.rochester.rr.com/alevy/dakota - andy-dml@levyclan.us
> - --------------------------------------------
> "Whatever Adam does, do the opposite and you'll be fine"
> -Bob Tom
> - --------------------------------------------
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
>
> iD8DBQFBZKlKxPJNBidNgHkRAso0AJ9fddqgs9+TmnrTwFYIgUGnvfqTSQCfc/Vo
> KRje260brQkkmNMrcn2d66U=
> =SXdR
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Nov 01 2004 - 10:47:42 EST