RE: Re: RE: Re: 1.6 vs. 1.7 rr's

From: Bernd D. Ratsch (fasstdak@hotmail.com)
Date: Sun Nov 14 2004 - 14:30:10 EST


Yes...and I've seen two running with .600+ lift on stock magnum heads or R/T
heads.

- Bernd

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of Gary Hedlin
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 7:11 PM
To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
Subject: Re: DML: Re: RE: Re: 1.6 vs. 1.7 rr's

On 11/13/04 7:08 PM, in article 003201c4c9e5$e5bfc2e0$53c20d44@SERVER,
""Mike Sykes"" <mikesykes@cox.net> wrote:

>
>>> Here's the formula:
> (Cam Lift/Rated Rocker Ratio)* New Rocker Ratio In other words: (.512
> / 1.6) * 1.7 = .544<<
>
> aiight... so (.512 / 1.5) x 1.7 = .580 lift That's a ton of lift....
>
> Newport News VA
> 2000 FR R/T CC
>
> "...someone set up us the bomb...."
>

Is that even possible with the stock style heads???? :)

-- 

Gary Hedlin www.garyhedlin.com 2005 Dakota SLT CC 4.7 5spd 1998 Dakota Sport RC 3.9



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 01 2005 - 11:47:52 EST