""Bernd D. Ratsch"" <fasstdak@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> CO2 doesn't perform better. We run our markers at 280FPS and most of us
> shoot anywhere from 15-22 rounds/sec. The CO2 freezes up....compresses
air
> doesn't.
>
> - Bernd
Do you have an electronic triggerframe? How are you shooting 15-22
rounds/sec? IIRC, the fastest you can pull the trigger manually is
something like 12-14 rounds/sec - and that's only if you're _really_ fast.
I've never had any problems running CO2 and I've played for a solid 8 - 10
hours in a row before at meets and such. I'm glad that compressed air works
better *for you* but for now I'll continue to run CO2 and be happy with it.
I do have to say that if Nitrogen is available, I'll play with that. I like
the way it performs better than CO2.
-- - Josh Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L I put on my robe and wizard hat.... www.omg-stfu.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 01 2005 - 10:04:31 EST