Re: 1992 Dakota 5.2 Auto FS, Low Miles

From: Josh Battles (josh@omg-stfu.com)
Date: Fri Apr 01 2005 - 17:45:04 EST


Jason Bleazard wrote:

> You and everyone else. The demand has really driven up the price on
> those. Last I checked, you can actually get a much newer YJ for the same
> amount of money. Of course, then you have to suffer the indignity of
> having square headlights. Oh well, apparently it's all academic anyway.

I was planning on getting one that's older than that... one with the
round headlights. They're cheaper and there are just as many parts
available, plus some of them have V8s in them.

>> However I have no intention of doing that, I'm planning on picking up
>>a 90 - 93 Fox body and building a racecar...
>
>
> Pardon my ignorance, but what's a "Fox body"?

it's the designation for a mustang, model years 79 - 93.

-- 
- Josh
Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L
Above Statement Not True    ^^^^^
www.omg-stfu.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 01 2005 - 01:40:54 EDT