Re: 1992 Dakota 5.2 Auto FS, Low Miles

From: jon@dakota-truck.net
Date: Sat Apr 02 2005 - 00:46:05 EST


Josh Battles <josh@omg-stfu.com> wrote:
: jon@dakota-truck.net wrote:
:>
:> :> However I have no intention of doing that, I'm planning on picking up
:> :> a 90 - 93 Fox body and building a racecar...
:>
:> : Pardon my ignorance, but what's a "Fox body"?
:>
:> That would be the pre SN95 body style.
:>
:> (I'm such a jerk.) ;-)

: LOL I'd thought about posting that in my response and now I'm glad I didn't.

   :-) Unfortunately, I'm only an amateur jerk, considering that I
went on to explain it in the next paragraph. An apprentice jerk
probably would have waited a few hours before explaining it in
another post, whereas a professional would have just left it at that.

:> Ok ok, think "Mustang", not the current body style, and not the
:> previous one, but the one before that. I must now slink away in
:> shame for dispensing Ford info in public. ;-)

: it's not *that* bad...

   Sure, that's how it starts... Give a few Ford facts here, a
modicum of Mercury there, mix in a little Lincoln lingo and before
you know it, you've got human sacrifice, dogs and cats living
together, mass hysteria!!

-- 
                                          -Jon-

.-- Jon Steiger ---- jon@dakota-truck.net or jon@jonsteiger.com --. | 1970 Barracuda - 1990 Dakota 'vert - 1992 Ram 4x4 - 1996 Dakota | | 1996 Intruder 1400 - 1996 Kolb FireFly - 2001 Ram QC 3500 CTD | `------------------------------------ http://www.jonsteiger.com --'



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 01 2005 - 01:40:54 EDT