In article <200504100959.11425.dml@bleazard.net>, dml@bleazard.net (Jason
Bleazard) writes:
>
> Heh... yeah, good point. I guess the next one could be in South Dakota just
> for the name value, but I personally think there'll be more fun things to do
> in Colorado.
>
> Mapquest says there is a place called "Dakota Hill" in Colorado. Looks like
> it isn't too far away from Denver. I can't actually see Dakota Hill on the
> map they generate, so there must not be a whole lot there. We should see if
> we can find it while we're there, just to get some pictures :-).
I'm pretty much thinking that any hill that you park a dozen or two dakota's on
becomes "Dakota Hill". :)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 01 2005 - 01:40:55 EDT