Wow Jon, you really put a lot of thought into that in a short amount of
time(somebody has waaaay to much free time on their hands....) anyway... yeah
a simple "bomb" in a location could be scouted out or a treasure... Limitless
RPG setup with paintball.. Secret Service, 1 president and Assassins etc...,
CTF with enough guns is always great.
jon@dakota-truck.net wrote:
>
> Bill Day <billday@otecom.net> wrote:
>
> : We played one once at a family reunion kinda like the quake mod TF with
> : border. You have border agents on one team, armed thugs on the other helping
> : weaponless
> : civilians "cross the border". Quite tiresome for the civilians as they run
> : a lot, but fun if you rotate and everybody becomes a moving target once in a
> : while.
>
>
> Yeah, that could work! I wasn't exactly sure how to work the
> "non-combatants" into the mix. Your idea sort've sparked another
> possibility in my brain - maybe put together "teams" of people where
> there are only 1 or 2 "guns" in the group for protection, but there
> are other tasks that need to be accomplished. Maybe some heavy duty
> navigation or some problem solving, or each person might have a
> specialization. Obviously I haven't thought this out in detail, but
> perhaps something where a team has to go out to locate, disarm and
> retrieve a nuclear bomb or biohazard device. Somebody is responsible
> for navigation, only one person on the team is capable of "disarming"
> the device (or perhaps for each task there can be a backup person, but
> points are deducted if the primary person doesn't do the task?), etc...
> For example, maybe the game would be decided via points where there
> are a certain number of points to be gained for each task, like
> disarming the bomb is 100 points, but if your primary bomb technician
> was shot and the backup guy had to do it, disarming the bomb would only
> get you 50 points. (Speaking of disarming the bomb, it could be just
> as simple as having a bomb technician with the team when the bomb is
> found would be considered disarming the bomb, or if I were feeling
> really ambitious, I could put together some "bombs" using a
> microcontroller where it could be set to a certain time and count down,
> the team would have to find it prior to that time. Also, possibly
> disarming the bomb would involve entering the correct code on a keypad,
> or actually snipping wires in a certain order in order to prevent having
> the bomb "detonate". This could potentially involve additional
> intelligence/problem solving such as a task which would be required to
> be accomplished in order to determine the proper disarm code or the
> proper order in which to cut the wires.)
>
> One catch to this is that there needs to be an enemy counterpart to
> these teams, so perhaps have individuals or other teams roaming the
> woods looking for these teams to stop them from getting to the bomb.
> We'd have to be careful about that part though, we don't want it to be
> too easy for the enemy to be able to find and constantly harrass the
> team. Another thought - the enemy could have non-armed combatants also
> - people could be used as scouts to try to find the teams; they wouldn't
> be armed themselves, but could use an FRS radio to (quietly!) call in the
> snipers once they've spotted the team, then they would be responsible
> for tracking the team and keeping the incoming bad guys updated as to
> their position. Obviously, the gunners for the "good guys" are going
> to want to take out these scouts as well as the bad guys with the guns.
> Shooting a scout means that person can no longer relay updates and has
> to head back to DML HQ. (Although if you do find and shoot a scout,
> unless you caught them completely by surprise, you can probably expect
> that they have called in your position and the heat is on its way to
> your current position.) :-) As far as the "good guy" teams themselves,
> if one of the people on the protection detail (armed combatant) gets
> shot, one of the other team members will have to pick up the gun and
> take over that position. (Again, perhaps with points deducted because
> that is not their primary function?)
>
> I was a bit worried that there wouldn't be enough guns available for a
> good paintball game, but I think we should be able to come up with some
> ideas like this which would involve people without guns and make it fun for
> everybody. (Like Don suggested, we could rotate so everybody got a chance
> to shoot.)
>
> Anybody else have any opinions/ideas in this regard? Or is this a
> dorky idea and you'd rather just have a normal paintball game? :-)
>
-- Bill Day"A rich man isn't always wealthy, he just has all the love he can give and ever wanted.." http://counter.li.org #384146 284016
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 01 2005 - 05:44:45 EDT