I agree. I think that if performance (efficiency) gains were to be had
with such a small, inexpensive apparatus like a TB spacer, the vehicle
manufacturers would have included them as original equipment.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net [mailto:owner-dakota-
>truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of Rick Barnes
>Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 3:44 PM
>To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
>Subject: RE: DML: RE: Throttle body spacer
>
>
>A K&N air filter, a cat back, a carsounds cat, etc...all those are
legit, a
>tb spacer does nothing whatsoever.
>
>Rascal
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
>[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of
>dean_ocque@yahoo.com
>Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 3:36 PM
>To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
>Subject: Re: DML: RE: Throttle body spacer
>
>
> When you run a four banger, any increase is better, a two horse
power
>increase is noticable on a 120 horse engine. So, what is something that
>will
>actually work.
>
> Dean
>
>> It won't screw up the PCM at all - however, it won't make any
noticeable
>> difference either. Save the money on something that will actually
work.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 01 2005 - 09:48:06 EDT