Carb spacers have always been a very legitimate tunning aid with carburated
cars. With the advent of large plenum volumes on port injected cars the spacer
will have much less effect or no effect. However, if the intake is basically an
adaptation of a carburated intake it may very well be worth while.
You will never see a manufacuter specify one for the simple reason if they
found it to be effective they would just revise the intake manifold casting to
incorporate it.
Dave Clement
99 SLT+ CC 4x4
In article
<812E00034E1CFA4FA406EB2B88D648C0039CBCFD@ocexchange2003.otterbein.edu>,
TPindell@otterbein.edu ("Pindell, Timothy") writes:
>
>
> I agree. I think that if performance (efficiency) gains were to be had
> with such a small, inexpensive apparatus like a TB spacer, the vehicle
> manufacturers would have included them as original equipment.
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net [mailto:owner-dakota-
> >truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of Rick Barnes
> >Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 3:44 PM
> >To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
> >Subject: RE: DML: RE: Throttle body spacer
> >
> >
> >A K&N air filter, a cat back, a carsounds cat, etc...all those are
> legit, a
> >tb spacer does nothing whatsoever.
> >
> >Rascal
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
> >[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of
> >dean_ocque@yahoo.com
> >Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 3:36 PM
> >To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
> >Subject: Re: DML: RE: Throttle body spacer
> >
> >
> > When you run a four banger, any increase is better, a two horse
> power
> >increase is noticable on a 120 horse engine. So, what is something that
> >will
> >actually work.
> >
> > Dean
> >
> >> It won't screw up the PCM at all - however, it won't make any
> noticeable
> >> difference either. Save the money on something that will actually
> work.
> >
> >
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 01 2005 - 09:48:06 EDT