Re: 5.2L a classic?

From: jon@dakota-truck.net
Date: Fri Sep 23 2005 - 17:56:27 EDT


Bob J <bobsoldbikes@yahoo.com> wrote:

: How could a 318 be a bored out 273 in 1957 when the
: 273 didn't come out until 1964?

  You are correct - it was the LA version of the 318 which was
a bored out 273.

: Classic has nothing to do with age, it's rather the
: car itself. Think about it- do you consider a '66
: Ambassador a 'classic'? If you saw a '52 Plymouth
: Savoy 4-door, is that a 'classic'? Are '73 Comets
: classics too?

    Roget's Thesaurus defines "classic car" as a vintage
automobile, and suggests "antique automobile", "antique car",
"classic automobile", and "vintage car" as synonyms. Also,
most car value guides have definitions for "new", "used",
and "classic". New being the current model year, used
going back to 1980-1990 or so, depending on the guide, and
classic being anything older than that.

   So.... yes, I would absolutely consider all of your examples
to be "classic cars".

: If you answered 'yes' to any of that, please slap
: yourself and go gargle some toilet bowl cleaner for
: awhile.

    After careful consideration, I have elected to take your
suggestion under advisement, but will perform no such action at
this time. :-)

-- 
                                          -Jon-

.-- Jon Steiger --- jon@dakota-truck.net or jon@jonsteiger.com --. | '70 Barracuda, '90 Dakota Convertible, '92 Ram 4x4, '96 Dakota | | '96 Intruder, '96 Kolb FireFly, '99 Cherokee, '01 Ram 3500 | `----------------------------------- http://www.jonsteiger.com --'



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Oct 01 2005 - 12:50:23 EDT