Re: 5.2L a classic?

From: Terrible Tom (SilverEightynine@aol.com)
Date: Fri Sep 23 2005 - 22:39:14 EDT


Bob J wrote:
> I take back what I said before- '67 was the first year
> of the LA 318. A engine 318 production stopped in the
> US in 1966, and continued on one more year (1967) in
> Canada.
>
> How could a 318 be a bored out 273 in 1957 when the
> 273 didn't come out until 1964?
>
> A engine 318s are 303s bored .030 over.
>
>
> Classic has nothing to do with age, it's rather the
> car itself. Think about it- do you consider a '66
> Ambassador a 'classic'? If you saw a '52 Plymouth
> Savoy 4-door, is that a 'classic'? Are '73 Comets
> classics too?
>
> If you answered 'yes' to any of that, please slap
> yourself and go gargle some toilet bowl cleaner for
> awhile.
>
> I know damn well nothing I own will ever be a classic-
> I've somehow managed to get over that however.
>

Dimma down nowa!! Someone put a scoop of regular in yer decaf this
morning??

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rocks are for skipping... I'm all about the mud
http://members.aol.com/silvereightynine/
AIM & Yahoo: SilverEightynine



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Oct 01 2005 - 12:50:23 EDT