Re: How many others with the 4.7 at 92,000 had to...

From: Josh Battles (josh.lists@omg-stfu.com)
Date: Sat Apr 01 2006 - 11:06:40 EST


On Fri, March 31, 2006 10:19 pm, Terrible Tom wrote:
>
> Ed McCarrick wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Mine just flipped over to 93K digger all is ok so far
>> (crosses fingers)
>>
>> Ed
>> '00 QC 4.7 4x4
>>
>
>
> Funny you mentioned that Ed. I was just wondering today how many miles
> your truck had. I was driving to work and saw a Quad Cab on the side of
> the road and thought, gee, I've been seeing lots of Quads lately. Which
> made me think that they were released in the 2000 model year - which
> made me think that wow - Ed's "new" Dak is already 6 years old which
> made me think of a post you sent a while back that you had such and such
> number of miles on your truck and didn't have to have the brakes dont
> yet, and someone said its probably because you use the engine/tranny to
> downshift and slow down before hitting the brakes, which made me wonder
> just how many miles you had on it :)
>
> FYI - I did not think you had that many miles - I was thinking in the
> 75K range

My 2000 has 92k on it and I've only had to replace my front brakes. The
rears are still the factory installed drums/shoes.

-- 
- Josh
www.omg-stfu.com

This message has been brought to you by the American Kneejerk Coalition for Equality, Compassion, and the Restoration of Karmic Unity of Self And Other Silly Hippy Happy-Swell Gayness Bullshit, or AKCECRKUSAOSHHSGB for short.

. . .------------------------------------------------------------------. | Make your plans NOW to attend the National DML Meet in Colorado! | | Date: July 15-23, 2006 - More info: http://meet.dakota-truck.net | `------------------------------------------------------------------'



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 01 2006 - 09:38:04 EDT