Re: How many others with the 4.7 at 92,000 had to...

From: Ed McCarrick (edmccarrick@yahoo.com)
Date: Sat Apr 01 2006 - 21:04:10 EST


--- Josh Battles <josh.lists@omg-stfu.com> wrote:

>
> On Fri, March 31, 2006 10:19 pm, Terrible Tom wrote:
> >
> > Ed McCarrick wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Mine just flipped over to 93K digger all is ok so
> far
> >> (crosses fingers)
> >>
> >> Ed
> >> '00 QC 4.7 4x4
> >>
> >
> >
> > Funny you mentioned that Ed. I was just wondering
> today how many miles
> > your truck had. I was driving to work and saw a
> Quad Cab on the side of
> > the road and thought, gee, I've been seeing lots
> of Quads lately. Which
> > made me think that they were released in the 2000
> model year - which
> > made me think that wow - Ed's "new" Dak is already
> 6 years old which
> > made me think of a post you sent a while back that
> you had such and such
> > number of miles on your truck and didn't have to
> have the brakes dont
> > yet, and someone said its probably because you use
> the engine/tranny to
> > downshift and slow down before hitting the brakes,
> which made me wonder
> > just how many miles you had on it :)
> >
> > FYI - I did not think you had that many miles - I
> was thinking in the
> > 75K range
>
> My 2000 has 92k on it and I've only had to replace
> my front brakes. The
> rears are still the factory installed drums/shoes.

Yeah should have mentioned my drums are still original

Ed

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

.
.
.------------------------------------------------------------------.
| Make your plans NOW to attend the National DML Meet in Colorado! |
| Date: July 15-23, 2006 - More info: http://meet.dakota-truck.net |
`------------------------------------------------------------------'



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 01 2006 - 09:38:04 EDT