carychip@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> Jon, Well I think you made a make a pretty convincing case that
> that gizmo is indeed the "water control valve". You gathered the
> facts and presented them in an orderly and simple manner such that
> even a numbskull like me could only come to the correct conclusion.
> The only thing missing from your argument was DNA evidence. I will
> take youralls word as gospel from now on.
Heheh! Thanks, hope I didn't bludgeon you *too* badly. :-) As far
as the gospel thing goes, we're only human, and I know I make stupid
mistakes all the time, so I dunno if I'd go that far. :-) Its a good
thing to question or at least keep digging until the answer is
obvious.
> So its as simple as splicing the water control valve in the new
> hose?
Yep, you should be able to remove it from the old hose and just
install it the same way in the new one. If you plan to backflush the
system at some point in the future, you can re-install the Prestone
tee the same way, or if not, just leave that out. (One less thing to
potentially leak, so there's no need to re-install it if its not
something you're going to use. If you aren't sure, those Prestone
tees are super easy to install so you can always do it at some point
in the future.)
--
-Jon-
.- Jon Steiger -- jon@dakota-truck.net or jon@jonsteiger.com -.
| '96 Kolb Firefly, '96 Suzuki Intruder, Miscellaneous Mopars |
`-------------------------------- http://www.jonsteiger.com --'
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 01 2007 - 09:06:10 EDT