RE: SRT10

From: Pindell, Tim P (TPindell@otterbein.edu)
Date: Mon Jul 09 2007 - 14:25:33 EDT


I understand. I'd buy something like that because it's a bad-ass piece
of machinery. The collectibility would be simply a bonus. The price
listed for it makes me wonder how much lower it could go. If its toward
the bottom of its depreciation, maybe it's a good value. Heh. I'm trying
to make a rational business decision about a truck that has little
redeeming social value. Sheesh. At least it can still haul stuff.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of
> hskr@san.rr.com
> Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 1:55 PM
> To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
> Subject: Re: DML: SRT10
>
>
> I think that long term they will probably be collectors, much
> like a lot of the older Mopars, but it will take 20-30 years.
> It's not a vehicle I would buy just to have as a collectors
> item someday hoping to make money off of. If you like it,
> buy it for you to drive and enjoy.
> But don't buy it expecting to flip it in a few years for a
> quick buck.
> Resale value and whether or not something is a collector item
> all depends on the potential buyers.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pindell, Tim P" <TPindell@otterbein.edu>
> Date: Monday, July 9, 2007 10:25 am
> Subject: DML: SRT10
> To: dml@dakota-truck.net
>
> >
> > Fellas:
> > What is your opinion on the long-term collectibility of the Ram
> > SRT10?I drove a low-mile '04 SRT10 this weekend. Sales dude saw me
> > eyeballing it as I went in to get parts and tossed me the
> keys on my
> > way out.
> > Seriously. It must have been something about 7/7/07. It's
> priced low
> > enough to make me go "Hmmmmmm..." and consider unloading the Dak.
> >
> > Tim
> >
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 01 2007 - 00:15:21 EDT