On Sep 29, 2007, at 11:35, David Gersic wrote:
>
> On Sunday 23 September 2007 11:20 am, WiLieR[SS] wrote:
>> That is considered a cv joint front driveshaft. I would rather use
>> the dbl cardan joint since the failure rate for them is much lower
>> than the cv style shaft. Yes, it requires swapping yokes on the
>> t-case, but it is well worth it.
>
> Well, Rockford seems to agree that the CV design wasn't such a good
> idea. I
> picked up my new shaft yesterday:
>
> http://www.zaccaria-pinball.com/temp/im005197.jpg
So do you get any sort of vibes out of that? There's a reason the
stock shaft used a CV or double cardan joint: mismatched angles. If
not, great. I (obviously) don't have a stock truck handy to measure
front driveshaft angles on....
-- +-- Mike Maskalans ---------------- Rochester, NY ----------+ | '98 Dakota CC, SAS on 40s '84 RamCharger 4x4, plow truck | | '02 Jetta TDI 5sp, daily '97 Intrepid, not on the road | +-------------------- <http://mike.tepidcola.com/trucks/> --+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 01 2007 - 00:07:06 EDT
