Uh oh... two somewhat controversial statements on a particularly volatile DML.
James, I can never remember what the official DML standing is on
generation listings. I personally see a huge difference between the 90
dak and the 92 (with 91 being a transitional year where the body was
modified... significantly in my eyes). So I'd agree with your Gen II
definition.
Digger, I much prefer the REAL daks over the '96+ fairy trucks ;-)
However, with the DML population of post-96 vs. pre-96 trucks in
mind... I will now duck and run.
Don in CT
89 Dak Vert 318 NV3500 4x4
74 Dart Sport 340
On 2/11/08, James Johnson <sixpackdak@execulink.com> wrote:
>
> Not to be overly picky, but isn't Gen II 1991-1996?
>
> James
>
snip
> >
> >The 2nd Generation Dakota will always reign supreme!
snip
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 02 2008 - 02:10:10 EST