Don Rey wrote:
> Uh oh... two somewhat controversial statements on a particularly volatile DML.
>
> James, I can never remember what the official DML standing is on
> generation listings. I personally see a huge difference between the 90
> dak and the 92 (with 91 being a transitional year where the body was
> modified... significantly in my eyes). So I'd agree with your Gen II
> definition.
>
> Digger, I much prefer the REAL daks over the '96+ fairy trucks ;-)
>
> However, with the DML population of post-96 vs. pre-96 trucks in
> mind... I will now duck and run.
>
No worries Don heh I have a mouth and a right foot big enough to handle
the worst situations :D
Hows the Vert Dak doing?? Get any estimates on the body work?
I'm starting to get the bug to get Christine finished - however I'm not
sure how I'm going to do it just yet. Odds are I'm going ot have the
finally break down and strip the 1995 Dak I bought and do a full MPFI
Magnum conversion like you did.
My plans to adapt a factory-like TBI fuelie dealy just seems to not want
to work. I ran into electronics compatibilty issues between the SMECS -
the Ram units don't have provisions to control my 46RH trannys
electronic OD and converter lock up. And a Premag GenII (90/91) Dak 318
computer is not the same pinouts as 88-89 SMECS - they changed the ECM's
in 90.
Miggity Mike! if you are out there - sorry bro - I can't keep it a
Premagger :-(
-- ------------------------------------------------------------ An ordinary person spends his life avoiding tense situations! Repo man spends his life gettin' IN tense situations!!! ------------------------------------------------------------ TerribleTom - AIM & Yahoo: silvereightynine http://www.myspace.com/silvereightynine http://members.aol.com/silvereightynine ------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 02 2008 - 02:10:10 EST