Pre 96 Dakotas are what God created.
Jim Knox
91 Dak
From: "Don Rey" <radon220@gmail.com>
Reply-To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
Subject: Re: DML: The bottom line is,the 2nd Generation Dakota IS the best
(1997-2004)
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:42:40 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from tomts42-srv.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.99]) by
bay0-pamc1-f1.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Mon,
11 Feb 2008 11:09:01 -0800
Received: from toip51.srvr.bell.ca ([67.69.240.53]) by
tomts42-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13
201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id
<20080211190901.XMAD1702.tomts42-srv.bellnexxia.net@toip51.srvr.bell.ca> for
<knox.james@sympatico.ca>; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:09:01 -0500
Received: from toip20.srvr.bell.ca ([67.69.240.22]) by toip51.srvr.bell.ca
with ESMTP; 11 Feb 2008 14:08:55 -0500
Received: from mail.twistedbits.net (HELO bent.twistedbits.net)
([72.45.149.62]) by toip20.srvr.bell.ca with ESMTP; 11 Feb 2008 14:08:54
-0500
Received: from bent.twistedbits.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])by
bent.twistedbits.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m1BIgqsu023723for
<dakota-truck-list@bent.twistedbits.net>; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:42:52 -0500
Received: (from mdomo@localhost)by bent.twistedbits.net
(8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id m1BIgqZ3023722for dakota-truck-list; Mon, 11 Feb
2008 13:42:52 -0500
Received: from bent.twistedbits.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])by
bent.twistedbits.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m1BIgqQK023719for
<dakota-truck-spamchecked@dakota-truck.net>; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:42:52 -0500
Received: (from jon@localhost)by bent.twistedbits.net
(8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id m1BIgptV023716for
dakota-truck-spamchecked@dakota-truck.net; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:42:51 -0500
Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com
[64.233.166.177])by bent.twistedbits.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id
m1BIgf5k023675for <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:42:42
-0500
Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so5366840pyh.17 for
<dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:42:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.233.12 with SMTP id f12mr672092qbh.34.1202755360379;
Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:42:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.65.148.6 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:42:40 -0800 (PST)
>
>Uh oh... two somewhat controversial statements on a particularly volatile
>DML.
>
>James, I can never remember what the official DML standing is on
>generation listings. I personally see a huge difference between the 90
>dak and the 92 (with 91 being a transitional year where the body was
>modified... significantly in my eyes). So I'd agree with your Gen II
>definition.
>
>Digger, I much prefer the REAL daks over the '96+ fairy trucks ;-)
>
>However, with the DML population of post-96 vs. pre-96 trucks in
>mind... I will now duck and run.
>
>Don in CT
>89 Dak Vert 318 NV3500 4x4
>74 Dart Sport 340
>
>
>On 2/11/08, James Johnson <sixpackdak@execulink.com> wrote:
> >
> > Not to be overly picky, but isn't Gen II 1991-1996?
> >
> > James
> >
>
>snip
> > >
> > >The 2nd Generation Dakota will always reign supreme!
>snip
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 02 2008 - 02:10:10 EST