RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Cold engine puts out more hp/tq...

From: Ray Block (BPracing@wowway.com)
Date: Fri Sep 19 2008 - 20:53:35 EDT


Brian, please give it a rest. I think this horse is dead enough. Accept
the fact your original statement concerning gas mileage vs. IAT sensor
placement is not correct for every combination and move on. Please....?
:-)

Ray
http://www.dragtruk.com/ENTRIES/20KM1FD2KWBP.html]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net [mailto:owner-dakota-
> truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of Brian
> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 8:15 PM
> To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
> Subject: DML: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Cold engine puts out more
> hp/tq...
>
>
> I'm not arguing that there aren't other factors involved, but even by your
> equation, the IAT is part of it. You change ANY value in the equation and
> the end result changes too. And since that includes IAT, then, by posting
> that formula, you supported what I said that tricking the PCM into
> thinking
> the IAT is lower than it actually is, you are changing the PW and
> therefore
> amount of fuel used. Or are you going to try and argue that the formula
> doesn't work the way it's written??
>
> brian cropp



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 01 2008 - 00:13:23 EDT