Personally I would go the loaded 2003. If you are going to be driving
it alot, well, it sucks driving a truck that isn't comfortable or
doesent do everything you want. The 5.9 you can actually use as a truck
when you have a mind to also...
Matt Brenneke wrote:
>
> Hello! I'm looking to get back in a Dakota <snip> I've found a 2005 ST (basic 3.7L V6, 2WD) with only
> 2880 miles(!), and a 2003 SLT Quad Cab/5.9L V8/4WD/loaded with 80000
> miles for about the same price that I'm trying to decide between. <snip>
> -Matt
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 01 2009 - 14:24:03 EDT