Matt Brenneke wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 27, 2009, at 9:29 PM, Terrible Tom wrote:
>
>>
>> Andy Levy wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Are you sure that '03 is a 5.9L 4x4? I don't think that combination
>>> was available. I thought the only way to get a 5.9 in a QC was 2WD,
>>> and even then only for a couple years.
>>
>>
>> I'm pretty sure they put the 360 in 4x4 Quad cab Daks. I thought I
>> remembered seeing some with that drive train, during some of my
>> frequent autotrader late night search sessions.
>>
>
>
> I went window shopping this morning while this was closed, and the
> windows sticker says it's a 4.7L, not the 5.9L. The magic VIN decoder
> on dakota-truck.net confirms this. The sales guy needs to be more
> careful putting things into autotrader.
>
> I don't think it influences my decision making process though. I still
> can't decide between the no-miles new-body basic truck, or high- miles
> but loaded old-body truck.
>
> -Matt
>
>
I still say go with the loaded truck, if you are going to drive it alot.
You will thank yourself..
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 01 2009 - 14:24:03 EDT