Re: Well, I finally did it...

From: Sam Parthemer (samp@cts.com)
Date: Thu Mar 13 1997 - 09:18:21 EST


Dan Myers wrote:
>
> Sam Parthemer wrote:
*snip*
> > 3700 280.6 197.7 277.2 195.3 <--Peak T 277.2
> > 4000 275.1 206.5 271.7 206.9
> > 4200 265.0 211.9 261.8 209.3
> > 4400 255.1 213.7 251.9 211.1 <--Peak H 211.1
> > ..
> > 5000 208.1 198.1 205.6 195.7
> >
> > Above 4400 the HP drops off on a steady curve, the
> > torque drops at the same rate...
> > The torque is pretty much a flat line with a slight
> > rise around 3200 towards 3700, then curves down
> > at the same rate as the HP.
> >
> > We compared this to a 5.9L Ram, and my HP @ 211.1
> > beat his 202 (until the a SuperCharger reading was shown!).
> > The torque of the 5.9L and my truck were nearly identical
> > at 277.2 for me, and 275.0 for him.
> >
> > The readings are in smaller increments, I only listed
> > the ones that had any significant changes... I'll scan
> > in the pages so anyone can view them... NEAT STUFF eh?
> >
> > sp
> Sam is that rear wheel hp or engine hp? I thought you should be puttin
> more hp out of that engine.

        That is rear wheel hp to the ground... The crank output should
be 18-30% more from what I have been told.
        
        ..Sam '95 SLT

 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:07:34 EDT