Re: 2100RPM at 70, not 2150

From: WillTier@aol.com
Date: Tue Apr 29 1997 - 17:22:24 EDT

Next message: WillTier@aol.com: "Re: 2100RPM at 70, not 2150"
Previous message: WillTier@aol.com: "Re: Jules' SS TBI (get 'em installed!)"
Maybe in reply to: Jeffrey Misner: "2100RPM at 70, not 2150"
Next in thread: WillTier@aol.com: "Re: 2100RPM at 70, not 2150"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

In a message dated 97-04-29 12:10:11 EDT, you write:

<< How about 3.21 - 3.90 ? >>

I'll check it out and post for 3.21 and 3.55

Bill

Next message: WillTier@aol.com: "Re: 2100RPM at 70, not 2150"
Previous message: WillTier@aol.com: "Re: Jules' SS TBI (get 'em installed!)"
Maybe in reply to: Jeffrey Misner: "2100RPM at 70, not 2150"
Next in thread: WillTier@aol.com: "Re: 2100RPM at 70, not 2150"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:07:38 EDT