2100RPM at 70, not 2150
From: Jeffrey Misner (jbmisner@mtu.edu)
Date: Mon Apr 28 1997 - 15:02:04 EDT
- Next message: 00gtomo@bsuvc.bsu.edu: "Re: '89 Shelby Dakota Stripes"
- Previous message: Lee Jacobs: "Grizzly Pushbar Experience"
- Next in thread: Brian Sessons: "RE: 2100RPM at 70, not 2150"
- Maybe reply: Brian Sessons: "RE: 2100RPM at 70, not 2150"
- Maybe reply: WillTier@aol.com: "Re: 2100RPM at 70, not 2150"
- Maybe reply: Keith R Wanderi: "RE: 2100RPM at 70, not 2150"
- Maybe reply: William R Bell Jr: "RE: 2100RPM at 70, not 2150"
- Maybe reply: mkarl@airmail.net: "RE: 2100RPM at 70, not 2150"
- Maybe reply: Alan Casey: "Re: 2100RPM at 70, not 2150"
- Maybe reply: Sam Parthemer: "Re: 2100RPM at 70, not 2150"
- Maybe reply: WillTier@aol.com: "Re: 2100RPM at 70, not 2150"
- Maybe reply: WillTier@aol.com: "Re: 2100RPM at 70, not 2150"
- Maybe reply: WillTier@aol.com: "Re: 2100RPM at 70, not 2150"
- Maybe reply: WillTier@aol.com: "Re: 2100RPM at 70, not 2150"
- Maybe reply: WillTier@aol.com: "Re: 2100RPM at 70, not 2150"
- Maybe reply: Sam Parthemer: "Re: 2100RPM at 70, not 2150"
- Maybe reply: David J. Hannu: "Re: 2100RPM at 70, not 2150"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
- Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Bill, and anyone else who was wonderin on the gearing of a 3.55 and an
auto. I said that at 70 my engine was turning about 2150 RPM's. I was
very puzzled how close my rev's were to Bill's 3.90 so I double checked
today. I got 'er up to 70 (didn't take too long) and then let the engine
and trans finally stabilize and the engine was at 2100 RPM's not the 2150
I said earlier. It's still not as big of a differance as I thought it
would be compared to Bill's (2250 I think you said).
Oh well, I just wanted to correct myself...
Jeff
'97 CC, 5.2L, 3.55, auto, 2wd
- Next message: 00gtomo@bsuvc.bsu.edu: "Re: '89 Shelby Dakota Stripes"
- Previous message: Lee Jacobs: "Grizzly Pushbar Experience"
- Next in thread: Brian Sessons: "RE: 2100RPM at 70, not 2150"
- Maybe reply: Brian Sessons: "RE: 2100RPM at 70, not 2150"
- Maybe reply: WillTier@aol.com: "Re: 2100RPM at 70, not 2150"
- Maybe reply: Keith R Wanderi: "RE: 2100RPM at 70, not 2150"
- Maybe reply: William R Bell Jr: "RE: 2100RPM at 70, not 2150"
- Maybe reply: mkarl@airmail.net: "RE: 2100RPM at 70, not 2150"
- Maybe reply: Alan Casey: "Re: 2100RPM at 70, not 2150"
- Maybe reply: Sam Parthemer: "Re: 2100RPM at 70, not 2150"
- Maybe reply: WillTier@aol.com: "Re: 2100RPM at 70, not 2150"
- Maybe reply: WillTier@aol.com: "Re: 2100RPM at 70, not 2150"
- Maybe reply: WillTier@aol.com: "Re: 2100RPM at 70, not 2150"
- Maybe reply: WillTier@aol.com: "Re: 2100RPM at 70, not 2150"
- Maybe reply: WillTier@aol.com: "Re: 2100RPM at 70, not 2150"
- Maybe reply: Sam Parthemer: "Re: 2100RPM at 70, not 2150"
- Maybe reply: David J. Hannu: "Re: 2100RPM at 70, not 2150"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
- Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29
: Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:07:37 EDT