Didn't really think about that, you know you may have a point here.
BTW, was the skid plate what you expected?
LJM
----------
> From: Keith R Wanderi <keith.wanderi@fsg.deluxe.com>
> To: 'dakota@ait.fredonia.edu'
> Subject: RE: '97 Trany Whoa's
> Date: Tuesday, June 03, 1997 7:32 AM
>
> Wow, kinda scary. Wonder if this has anything thing to do with
disgruntled employees who didn't appreciate being out of work for so long??
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: L. J. Morris [SMTP:ljohn@alltel.net]
> Sent: Monday, June 02, 1997 5:17 PM
> To: dakota@ait.fredonia.edu
> Subject: '97 Trany Whoa's
>
> Hey folks;
>
> Here's an update that some may be interested in:
>
> About a week or so back I posted about my Dealer having sold a truck
> similar to mine except it had an auto. Well after the fella put about
400
> miles on it (we all know that don't take to long, I don't even like
gettin'
> outta my truck) he brought it back complaining that it 'shuddered' in
> reverse with a load on it. The Dealer pulled the trany pan and it was
full
> of shavings (appearance greater than normal) so they order him a new
trany
> and put it in about a week later, guess what new trany does the same
thing.
> The mechanic is just scratchin' his head.
>
> I have a funny feeling that CC may be feeling the ol'e quality control
vs.
> demand syndrome. I know these parts are out-sourced but I would bet CC
is
> puttin' the pressure on the suppliers as the customer is puttin' pressure
> on CC to produce trucks. What'd ya think?
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:07:43 EDT