Bruce Aaron Hefner wrote:
>
> I have to agree with you Frank, it seems that after you design a good
> engine, you'd design good accessories to go with it instead of restricting
> the engine and using same shitty accessories. I guess they never heard
> the old saying "In for a penny, in for a pound.) (Is that right, I know
> it's something like that), i.e. after spending that much money and time on
> the engine looks like they could of spent a little more on accessories.
> Of course this is ford we're talking about so what do you expect.
Well, the truth about the Taurus SHO is that it's still a Ford
underneath.
The best part of the car is the engine - what a jewel. The rest of the
car was plain jane Ford. At a minimum they should have at least
engineered
the drivetrain and accessories to match the capability of the engine. I
don't even want to start in on the clutch problems......
Oh well......Maybe CC will put the 3.5DOHC in the Aveneger...Whew!
cheers,
Phil
'97 Dakota
'67 Charger
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:07:44 EDT