Re: Cat Back Exhaust

From: mm m mmm (partstek@juno.com)
Date: Sat Jul 05 1997 - 17:29:35 EDT


Shawn,
    I like the sound the system gave my truck over stock. I think these
systems are just what you want if you want to here your radio.I realy
dont think you can compare mustang stock exhaust to Dakota stock axhaust.
The price is good and I think it sounds great. I did notice performance
in my 3.9 (NOT5.0).I like it..........

                                                    Mike Cabe
                                                    partstek@juno.com
On Sun, 06 Jul 1997 06:48:15 +0900 Shawn Shultzaberger
<shultzas@mwr.kic.or.jp> writes:
>
>--------------FD265CB1AA2208C63F5FB1A1
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>mm m mmm wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> Over the last couple weeks I have seen a lot of interest in
>> exhaust,
>> so I uploaded the application chart from the
>> Walker Dynomax Catalog. These systems feature aluminized mandrel
>bent
>> pipes and the Super Turbo Muffler.
>> The muffler has a life time warranty. You will see applications for
>> 4,6
>> and 8 cyl Dakotas. They only offer up to the 1995 year but are
>working
>> on
>> newer apps as we speak. If you are interested point your web browser
>> to
>> http://members.tripod.com/~RockValley/test-1.html. You can find
>these
>> systems at any parts store that carrys
>> Walker exhaust. The system for my 1994 3.9 Reg. cab 4X4 was about
>> $165.00
>> it fits like O.E. and comes with everything you need. Let me know if
>I
>>
>> can help with questions or prices....
>>
>> Mike Cabe
>> partstek@juno.com
>
> Let me add one thing. I have had the Cat Back Super Turbo Muffler
>set
>up on my 91 Moostang. The reason I switched to the Flow Master setup
>was because of two things. #1... The Dynomax system sounded exactly
>the
>same as my stock mufflers at idle. #2... It had this awful intrusive
>drone at 2000 rpms. The sound was over whelming. The mufflers really
>resonate between 1500 and 2500 rpms. Now if you like that kind of
>thing
>go for it. At WOT they were just slightly louder than my stock
>mufflers. Plus there was no real performance increase that I could
>feel. The performance increase from the Flowmasters was slightly
>noticeable. Now, I am not saying that all Dynomax products suck.
>Its
>just that my experience with them has been less than wonderful. I am
>going with the Race Magnum that Sean has. It is a straight thru
>design
>and should sound nice. I can't wait to hear the .wav files. : -)
>Just my lowly .02 worth......
>
>Shawn
>(97 V8 5spd RegCab 3.55sg)
>
>--------------FD265CB1AA2208C63F5FB1A1
>Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
><HTML>
>mm m mmm wrote:
><BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>Hi all,
><BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Over the last couple weeks I have seen a lot of
>interest in exhaust,
><BR>so I uploaded the application chart from the
><BR>Walker Dynomax Catalog. These systems feature aluminized mandrel
>bent
><BR>pipes and the Super Turbo Muffler.
><BR>The muffler has a life time warranty. You will see applications
>for
>4,6
><BR>and 8 cyl Dakotas. They only offer up to the 1995 year but are
>working
>on
><BR>newer apps as we speak. If you are interested point your web
>browser
>to
><BR><A
>HREF="http://members.tripod.com/~RockValley/test-1.html">http://members.tripod.com/~RockValley/test-1.html>.
>You can find these
><BR>systems at any parts store that carrys
><BR>Walker exhaust. The system for my 1994 3.9 Reg. cab 4X4 was about
>$165.00
><BR>it fits like O.E. and comes with everything you need. Let me know
>if
>I
><BR>can help with questions or prices....
>
><P>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
>Mike Cabe
><BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
>
partstek@juno.com</BLOCKQUOTE>
>&nbsp;Let me add one thing.&nbsp; I have had the Cat Back Super Turbo
>Muffler
>set up on my 91 Moostang.&nbsp; The reason I switched to the Flow
>Master
>setup was because of two things.&nbsp; #1... The Dynomax system
>sounded
>exactly the same as my stock mufflers at idle.&nbsp; #2... It had this
>awful intrusive drone at 2000 rpms.&nbsp; The sound was over
>whelming.&nbsp;
>The mufflers really resonate between 1500 and 2500 rpms.&nbsp; Now if
>you
>like that kind of thing go for it.&nbsp; At WOT they were just
>slightly
>louder than my stock mufflers.&nbsp; Plus there was no real
>performance
>increase that I could feel.&nbsp; The performance increase from the
>Flowmasters
>was slightly noticeable.&nbsp; Now,&nbsp; I am not saying that all
>Dynomax
>products suck.&nbsp; Its just that my experience with them has been
>less
>than wonderful.&nbsp;&nbsp; I am going with the Race Magnum that Sean
>has.&nbsp;
>It is a straight thru design and should sound nice.&nbsp; I can't wait
>to hear the .wav files.&nbsp; : -)
><BR>Just my lowly .02 worth......
>
><P>Shawn
><BR>(97 V8 5spd RegCab 3.55sg)</HTML>
>
>--------------FD265CB1AA2208C63F5FB1A1--
>
>
>

 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:07:47 EDT