> From: Steve <Slow@Primenet.Com>
> To: dakota@ait.fredonia.edu
> Subject: Re: 98 prices are out
> Date: Thursday, September 04, 1997 11:23 AM
>
> On Thu, 4 Sep 1997 07:30:10 -0400, you wrote:
>
> >- How could there be an R/T 4x4, unless it was full-time 4wd,
> >engineered for maximum handling, rather than off-road prowess? A
> >high-ground clearance R/T just wouldn't make sense. Now there could be
a
> >360 4x4; but not an R/T 4x4.
>
>
> Why not? Other than the engine and the strips the R/T package looks
> like a SLT order to me. I almost kicked myself when I found out that
> they were going to make a 4X4 R/T, but now I am glad I didn't wait.
> The 318 is plenty overkill for what I do with it....
>
>
> Steve
Apparently the R/T is more than just the 5.9 (360) and stripes. It is also
a standard automatic tranny, special (*free flowing*) exhaust,
*performance* suspension (so that eliminates the 4x4), and low profile
tires. Not too compatible with the jacked-up 4x4 set.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:07:51 EDT