>
> >
> > Go scott, way to set things straight. I agree with you that the tone in
> > those posts was getting bad, I mean it is posibble to disagree with
> > someone without belittling them. I have know experience with the engines
> > running backwards so I'll let ya'll work that out, I just think everyone
> > needs to try and remember to treat each other with respect. Just my
> opin.
> >
> > Bruce
>
> Sorry if things were taken the wrong way. I was agreeing the entire
> time with Scott, but adding some fun to the end. I'll just take my toys
> and
> go home... LOL...
>
> It is agreed that engines can run either way, two-stroke, four-stoke...
> and we won't even talk about rotory's!!! Why can't we all get along!
> How about getting Chrysler Corp to fix this darn Seat BELT issue 80-90% of
> us have??
>
> Sam '95 SLT Dakota
> http://www.users.cts.com/king/s/samp/
>
Way to change the subject there Sam, J/K. Anyway, I just hope the
misunderstanding between everyone is cleared up now. Maybe we can all get
along now. BTW, what seat belt issue?
Bruce
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:07:54 EDT