Re: R/T Disappoints?

From: Jim Oitzinger (delspam.jozinger@infohwy.com)
Date: Fri Dec 12 1997 - 12:02:59 EST


Number of posts have indicated some head scratching going on as to the R/T's
disappointing test numbers. Was wondering just how much a pop would be
expected?

That is, the 5.9L is only rated 20 hp over the 5.2L, how much improvement in
the numbers should there be?

Jim Oitzinger
'98 CC 4x4 5.2L 5spd optioned out

> > Subject: DML: RE: Re: Dakota R/T
> >
> > What did the Jeep have it in for gears? Thats the only thing that I can
> > think of right away that would make a difference (other than like you
> > say a "hot" Jeep and a "dud" R/T...
> >
> > Craig
>
> Cherokee had 3.73 / You would think the R/T would have
> 3.90 but the article didn't say.
>
> Catlin



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:08:02 EDT