>
>
> Number of posts have indicated some head scratching going on as to the R/T's
> disappointing test numbers. Was wondering just how much a pop would be
> expected?
>
> That is, the 5.9L is only rated 20 hp over the 5.2L, how much improvement in
> the numbers should there be?
>
>
> Jim Oitzinger
> '98 CC 4x4 5.2L 5spd optioned out
>
>
I think what everyone is disappointed about is that it didn't even match
the 318's performance, much less exceed it, right guys?
Bruce
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:08:02 EDT