>
> At 08:14 AM 1/26/98 , you wrote:
>
> > I still believe that 4-point harnesses would be a better and cheaper
> >safety system than 3-point + airbag.
> >
> > Ron
> >
>
> I don't doubt for one minute that you are absolutely correct about that.
> But the point is not what is better or cheaper, it's what will be used and
> provide the greatest protection for the greatest number of people under the
> most circumstances. If it's not used it may as well not be there. All these
> issues were considered when it was decided to go with something more than
> just lap belts. There are other issues also such as how to anchor 4 point
> belts and still provide a nice looking interior (one that Detroit can sell
> to the public). 3 point + airbag is a compromise between the tanks the
> government would like to see us drive and the easy to sell, high profit
> cars Detroit wanted to make.
>
> --
> Mike Crumley mcrumley@airmail.net
> 97 Dakota Regular Cab Short Bed
> 3.9L V6 3.55 Auto
> DDBC Bug Shield
> Got 'em: Mud Flaps
>
You are probably right Mike, but I don't see why they still can't offer
the 4-points as an option, so if you choose to go that route you can
without having to do serious mods to your vehicle....
Bruce
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:08:07 EDT