On Fri, 6 Mar 1998 17:20:21 -0500 am14@chrysler.com wrote:
>JT writes: >>But I really like the magic of the 340 -
spins well,
>makes big horsepower. <<
>
>If you're contemplating making a 340 from the current 318
for a Dak
>application, you'll be OK, but if you're contemplating
using an old 340
>block, you're in for a lot of mods. The motor mounts are
in different
>places, and the older "A" blocks don't even have pads for
drilling
>where the current Magnums have the motor mounts. Secondly
the 340 used
>solid lifters - has no means of oiling for the hydraulic
lifters.
>Heads for pre-magnum and magnum are not interchangeable.
These are just
>a few I know about. I have an '89 thet is V6 TBI and I
would love for
>it to be a Magnum 360 with sequential MPI. Still might do
it some day.
>
>Azie
>Ardmore, Al.
>
The FSM for my 92 5.2l says you can only bore .030" so
to get any more displacement you have to stroke it.There
goes
the revs.
Karl Moltzan
92 CC 4X2 5.2L 4/5RT(stock cam)
1.7Crower, Electric Fans
DTs,Stock coil
B&M Shifter 4200lbs
15.054@90.124
kmoltzan@mymail.net
Dallas Texas
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:08:21 EDT