In a message dated 98-03-20 14:03:08 EST, you write:
<< I just can't figure out why they are doing this. I've taken both AP
>Economics and now microeconomic theory, and I know of no justifiable reason
>to do this.
I know that this is a frustrating experience for those of you who were/are
wanting to get a R/T, but to be fair, I doubt that this is something that
CC either planned or wanted to happen. Something like this can only cause
anger and bitterness, so why would they intentionally do that? To make a
few extra bucks on 2000 trucks? I doubt it. It's probably just the way
things worked out and they are trying to make the best of the situation.
I'm sure there must be more to this than has been kicked around in the
list. Also, if you look back in the history of _any_ car company, you
will find this same kind of snafu, especially with specialty vehicles like
the R/T.
Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong.
--
Mike Crumley mcrumley@airmail.net
97 Dakota Regular Cab Short Bed
3.9L V6 3.55 Auto
>>
Keep in mind that CC isn't making any more or less on the R/T than if they
made a "bazillion" of them. CC made about the same $$ on my '98. The DEALERS
who will get MSRP+ will be the ones to make out. The same as with Prowlers
and Vipers (for a while).
Tom Ware
'98 CC 5.2 3.55 auto
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:08:28 EDT