At 07:29 AM 5/12/98 -0400, you wrote:
>Jealous??? Nah....
>
>But who DOESNT want more power! (Argh Argh Argh!!)
>
>Regular Dak???? No such thing.
>
>My 4x4 Bonzai Blue Metallic short bed standard cab with the V8 and 3.90s
>smokes much of the "sporty" cars on the road......Actually, the R/T is just
>a "regular Dak" with fat tires and a bigger engine (Oh God, here come the
>flames!!!) :-)
>
Did you forget the HD trans, the aluminum driveshaft, the 9.25 12 bolt
rear end, HD brakes upgraded suspension, 17x9 wheels, wheel flares...
you must have
Tony
>I am happy that you are proud of your "unique" Dak, but dont be shocked
>when, in a couple years, they are stuffing one of the new generation 275+ HP
>"power tech" V8s into theDaks....My V8, in 92, was the BIGGEST damn engine
>put into this size pickup anywhere....Now it aint.....Its called progress.
>
>
>
>At 08:41 PM 5/11/98 -0800, you wrote:
>>>
>>>I second that statement....it almost seeems as if the 5.2L guys are
>>>jealous of the R/T's! Maybe its because they wish they had one of the
>>>2000 R/T's built (1700 CC's, 300 RC's) in stead of one of the 2 million or
>>>so regular Dak's that you see every day.
>>>
>>>-james
>>>'89 RC R/T
>>>
>>>Did Dodge make R/T's in '89? Inteersting...:) Adios...
>>
>>*^*^*^*^*^*^*^
>>^Bobby Wilken*^*^*^
>>*Fairbanks, Alaska*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*
>>^'97 SLT+, 318ci, CC, 4x4, Flame Red, K&N, Gibson Duals,^
>>*Quite a sweet stereo w/ 6 disc and bass,^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*
>>^and every single option there is...^*^*^*
>>*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>"M ove O ver, P ickup A pproacing R apidly!"
>1992 Dakota 4x4, Standard cab, short bed, 5.2 L V8, K&N, Gibson/Dynomax
>exhaust,Power Puleys, MP SBEC, 180 degree thermostat, Bushwhackers,
>tire/wheel package, Lund Moonvisor & Interceptor, Custom Cover tonneau,
>Bundy rear bumper, chrome grillguard/pushbar
>
>see http://www.usaor.net/users/zavetsky for pictures!
>
>MOPAR or NOCAR!
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:08:47 EDT