Re: Re: New Dakota

From: david zavetsky (zavetsky@usaor.net)
Date: Tue May 12 1998 - 07:29:43 EDT


Jealous??? Nah....

But who DOESNT want more power! (Argh Argh Argh!!)

Regular Dak???? No such thing.

My 4x4 Bonzai Blue Metallic short bed standard cab with the V8 and 3.90s
smokes much of the "sporty" cars on the road......Actually, the R/T is just
a "regular Dak" with fat tires and a bigger engine (Oh God, here come the
flames!!!) :-)

I am happy that you are proud of your "unique" Dak, but dont be shocked
when, in a couple years, they are stuffing one of the new generation 275+ HP
"power tech" V8s into theDaks....My V8, in 92, was the BIGGEST damn engine
put into this size pickup anywhere....Now it aint.....Its called progress.

At 08:41 PM 5/11/98 -0800, you wrote:
>>
>>I second that statement....it almost seeems as if the 5.2L guys are
>>jealous of the R/T's! Maybe its because they wish they had one of the
>>2000 R/T's built (1700 CC's, 300 RC's) in stead of one of the 2 million or
>>so regular Dak's that you see every day.
>>
>>-james
>>'89 RC R/T
>>
>>Did Dodge make R/T's in '89? Inteersting...:) Adios...
>
>*^*^*^*^*^*^*^
>^Bobby Wilken*^*^*^
>*Fairbanks, Alaska*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*
>^'97 SLT+, 318ci, CC, 4x4, Flame Red, K&N, Gibson Duals,^
>*Quite a sweet stereo w/ 6 disc and bass,^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*
>^and every single option there is...^*^*^*
>*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*
>
>
>
>
"M ove O ver, P ickup A pproacing R apidly!"
1992 Dakota 4x4, Standard cab, short bed, 5.2 L V8, K&N, Gibson/Dynomax
exhaust,Power Puleys, MP SBEC, 180 degree thermostat, Bushwhackers,
tire/wheel package, Lund Moonvisor & Interceptor, Custom Cover tonneau,
Bundy rear bumper, chrome grillguard/pushbar

see http://www.usaor.net/users/zavetsky for pictures!

MOPAR or NOCAR!



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:08:47 EDT