the FIPK is not the same , it's more like the new Ramair product with a
cone shaped K&N filter on the end . That's why he says it looks like a
turbo intake tube .
At 11:37 PM 6/22/98 -0400, you wrote:
>At 05:12 PM 6/22/98 -0400, you wrote:
>>Your experiments sounds interesting Scott. I'm looking forward to your
data on
>>temps in the stock airhorn area. I've just completed an FIPK install and its
>>performance beats the FABM hands down (My opinion). The FABM is pretty, but
>>old technology. I fabricated an FIPK, total cost about $65. Looks like a
turbo
>>intake tube and best of all, it works.
>>
>
> I don't understand. The FABM is nothing more than a copy of K&N's
>FIPK. The only difference is that the FABM uses a non-K&N air can.
> The FIPK is an open element air cleaner, and so is the FABM. Neither
>has any ducting or anything like that. Can you clarify?
>
>
> -Jon-
>
> .--- stei0302@cs.fredonia.edu ------------------------------------.
> | Affiliations: DoD, EAA, MP Race Team, NMA, SPA, USUA. RP-SEL |
> | '96 Dodge Dakota v8 SLT CC (15.21@89.82), '96 Kolb FireFly 447 |
> `----------------------- http://www.cs.fredonia.edu/~stei0302/ ---'
>
W . Jack Hilton III
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:08:58 EDT