At 05:12 PM 6/22/98 -0400, you wrote:
>Your experiments sounds interesting Scott. I'm looking forward to your data on
>temps in the stock airhorn area. I've just completed an FIPK install and its
>performance beats the FABM hands down (My opinion). The FABM is pretty, but
>old technology. I fabricated an FIPK, total cost about $65. Looks like a turbo
>intake tube and best of all, it works.
>
I don't understand. The FABM is nothing more than a copy of K&N's
FIPK. The only difference is that the FABM uses a non-K&N air can.
The FIPK is an open element air cleaner, and so is the FABM. Neither
has any ducting or anything like that. Can you clarify?
-Jon-
.--- stei0302@cs.fredonia.edu ------------------------------------.
| Affiliations: DoD, EAA, MP Race Team, NMA, SPA, USUA. RP-SEL |
| '96 Dodge Dakota v8 SLT CC (15.21@89.82), '96 Kolb FireFly 447 |
`----------------------- http://www.cs.fredonia.edu/~stei0302/ ---'
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:08:58 EDT