Just guessing, but I think you'd get too much advance and a very rich condition.
Klaus
Rekker21@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 98-07-21 13:10:37 EDT, you write:
>
> << . There is a definite "seat of the pants" increase though, at
> least I experienced this with my Stage 2 chip. But everything considered, the
> MP part is the best if it's available for your application. >>
> Klaus, what if you used both!?!?!?!?!?!? Im considering this!
> Eric
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:09:08 EDT