I am currently using the JET Stage II in my 98 Ram - excellant chip.
Stage II requires the use of 91 grade fuel and with the use of 91, I
have NO detonation
problems. California fuel isn't nearly as good as the fuel you receive
in other states. Additionally JET will custom program chips to take
advantage of other
modifications like superchargers, modified throttle bodies, etc.
Additionally, their modifications take into account all aspects of the
engine controller, (part
throttle, WOT, and idle).Fuel and ignition maps have been changed and it
is very friendly with OBDII. Check out their website "www.jetchip.com".
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Glenn & Lynn [SMTP:vanderbu@silk.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 1998 9:08 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: Re: DML: J.E.T. computer enhancement
>
> I have heard that with the JET products you can use a lower grade of
> fuel.
> Dodges computer requires that you run 94 grade, some people manage to
> get
> away with 91 grade. Jet has 2 packages, Stage-1 for basically stock
> engines
> where you don't do any more than upgraded exhaust and intake, but no
> headers using something like 89 grade fuel, then stage 2 will require
> more
> than the mods mentioned above but requests you now use 94 grade I
> believe.
> Sorry don't know of anyone that has one in. Tried to find a place
> where I
> could buy one for wives Grand Jeep with the I6 engine, but know one in
> Canada handles them, or you have to order it and send them a stick of
> gold
> for it.
>
> ----------
> > From: Klaus Wilkens <klaus@buffnet.net>
> > To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> > Subject: Re: DML: J.E.T. computer enhancement
> > Date: Tuesday, July 21, 1998 8:32 PM
> >
> > Just guessing, but I think you'd get too much advance and a very
> rich
> condition.
> >
> > Klaus
> >
> > Rekker21@aol.com wrote:
> >
> > > In a message dated 98-07-21 13:10:37 EDT, you write:
> > >
> > > << . There is a definite "seat of the pants" increase though, at
> > > least I experienced this with my Stage 2 chip. But everything
> considered, the
> > > MP part is the best if it's available for your application. >>
> > > Klaus, what if you used both!?!?!?!?!?!? Im considering this!
> > > Eric
> >
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:09:08 EDT