Where did they actually advertise mandrel bent pipe ?
Hell , who was that guy that got the entirely wrong setup on his R/T ?
That wasn't you was it Bruce ?
At 10:58 AM 8/4/1998 -0700, you wrote:
>If I get the same exhaust as is on the R/T s I've seen, I will send it
>back due to false advertising. The two R/T s I've looked under most
>definitely did not have mandrel bent pipe. It might have been 3", but
>from the manifolds to the tip, it was just as crooked and crimped as
>the pipe on my 97 rc. I even brought it to the attention of one of
>the sales associates at the dealership I was at. If the R/T s are
>supposed to have mandrel bent pipes, then there are at least two
>buyers in Dallas that will not get what was advertised.
>
>Tate
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: |< R |> [SMTP:krp@netnitco.nett]
>Sent: Monday, August 03, 1998 2:33 PM
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>Subject: Re: DML: Dynomax exhaust
>
>> From: "STRICKLAND, Tate" <tstricklan@shl.com>
>> To: "'dakota-truck@buffnet.net'"
><dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>> Subject: DML: Dynomax exhaust
>> Date: Mon, 3 Aug 1998 08:08:15 -0700
>> Reply-to: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>
>> Ordered a Dynomax 3" y-back system on Friday. Got the cat back with
>> UltraFlo muffler, 3" cat converter, and they sent a two foot piece
>of
>> 3" pipe to take care of the normal cat back system necking down to
>> 2.5" where it meets the cat and to join the cat to the y collector.
>> System was $319 total including shipping. Any comments? I think
>> it's a good deal.
>>
>> Tate
>
>That's the same system that comes on the stock R/T.
>
>|{eith R. Phelps
>
>
>Cat..... the other white meat.
>
>
Jack Hilton
Black '98 R/T Club Cab
http://www.mindspring.com/~hemi/jbd1.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:09:17 EDT