RE: K&N FIPK on the dyno

From: Holloway,Frank T (Frank.T.Holloway@KP.ORG)
Date: Thu Aug 27 1998 - 17:08:19 EDT


Bob,
Thanks for providing the info to us. I have never played with the K&N open
element before for two reasons. I don't like the sound at high throttle
settings (personal
preference, try listening to it for hours as you tug a boat across desert
out here in Calif). And I am one that believes in ducting cold air to the
engine (1% loss in
horsepower for every 10 Deg. rise in inlet air temp). I prefer the drop-ins
and I am pleased in them (definitely Not as nice looking). Again thanks for
the info, no
better way (for all of us), then a pull.
        Frank

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Mankin [SMTP:bob@cadpros.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 1998 1:34 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: DML: K&N FIPK on the dyno
>
> For anyone that's interested, I managed to get a couple of pulls done on
> a DynoJet last Friday just before my JBA install. Unfortunately, I
> didn't realize until well into the deal that the guy running it was
> fairly new to working with the DynoJet. He had worked with a motor dyno
> for a number of years, but the chasis dyno was a recent installation for
> them. I was getting 24000 readings on the RPM readouts and his RPM
> graphic had the needle just spinning in circles. Well, that's what
> happens when you clip on the coil wire rather than a plug wire like
> you're supposed to :^O
>
> After some fussing around, we managed to get what I feel were some
> stable baseline pulls(2). I went to the trouble of re-installing the
> stock air intake just for this run. I still had the 180 T-stat
> installed(wasn't willing to back up that far<g>) but it gave me some
> idea of what rear wheel stock HP is. For the last run, I installed the
> 14" K&N. I was a bit disappointed to see the rear wheel HP be so low. I
> believe our max HP run with the K&N was only about 185 HP. I think Mike
> Catlin's R/T came in at about 215+. I guess that's roughly the
> advertised difference(30 HP) between a 318 and the 360.
>
> Bottom line: I did see about a 4 HP increase with the K&N over stock.
> Put that info in the FWIW file for anyone contemplating a purchase or
> wondering what their open element might be giving them performance-wise.
> I'll try to post the actual printout numbers later.
>
> Plan to make some fresh runs next week to see what the JBAs and JET chip
> have gained in HP.
>
> Bob



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:09:27 EDT