RE: Ram vs. Dakota

From: Mok, Alan (AMok@spbank.com)
Date: Tue Sep 15 1998 - 18:40:09 EDT


How come your address is "fordf-series" then?

Seriously now, I've driven both. My friend's '97 Ram CC (318 sport
package 3.5 axle). It feels a lot bigger than a Dak. The back seat is
roomy almost sedan like. You're higher up and the handling is "looser".
I think it really depends on how much you need to haul around. I wish I
can drive a RAM SS/T so I can directly compare it with my R/T.

Alan

'98 Dakota R/T (Headers, FABM & waiting for Shift kit)
'89 Mustang GT (347, Griggs, S-trim...)
Ducati 916 (someday)

                -----Original Message-----
                From: Joe t [mailto:fordf-series@juno.com]
                Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 1998 2:19 PM
                To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
                Subject: DML: Ram vs. Dakota

                I am a Dodge and Chevrolet fanatic. But since I have a
family member who
                worked for Chrysler, I will probably get a Dodge. I am
wondering if
                anyone here has a Ram and a Dakota. I am wondering
witch one is nicer.
                Easy to drive, good gas milage, and is more comfotable.
Thank You.

                Joe
                FordF-Series@juno.com

                



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:09:50 EDT