RE: RE: 99 R/T Tires

From: Mok, Alan (AMok@spbank.com)
Date: Thu Sep 17 1998 - 12:14:06 EDT


For maximum road holding and predictable behavior at the limit (in terms
of handling):

285s are too wide for a 9" rim.

275 is marginal. 255 is optimal.

I think Yokohama make a truck version of their AVS tire in a 255/50-17
size. That would be the closest.

Alan

'98 Dakota R/T (Headers, FABM & waiting for Shift kit)
'89 Mustang GT (347, Griggs, S-trim...)
Ducati 916 (someday)

                -----Original Message-----
                From: |< R |> [mailto:krp@netnitco.nett]
                Sent: Thursday, September 17, 1998 3:43 AM
                To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
                Subject: Re: DML: RE: 99 R/T Tires

> From: "Mok, Alan (SPB Brentwood)"
<AMok@spbank.com>
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: DML: RE: 99 R/T Tires
> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1998 07:22:29 -0700
> Reply-to: dakota-truck@buffnet.net

> RS-A
>
>
> Decent tire for the price. Since there aren't any
other tire available
> in that size, I'll be screwed if they discontinue it.
They're listed
> for $151ea from the Tire Rack.
>
> Alan

                Just get a wider tire with a shorter sidewall. As long
as the
                sidewall is the same height. Like 280/45's (I think,
dont have a
                calculator handy).

                |{eith R. Phelps

                Cat..... the other white meat.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:09:50 EDT